An atheist was walking through the woods and wondered aloud:
“What majestic trees! What powerful rivers! What beautiful animals!”
As he was walking alongside the river, he heard a rustling in the bushes behind him and he turned to look. He saw a 7-foot grizzly bear charging towards him.
He ran as fast as he could up the path. He looked over his shoulder and saw that the bear was closing in on him. He looked over his shoulder again, and the bear was even closer. He tripped and fell to the ground. He rolled over to pick himself up but saw that the bear was right on top of him, reaching for him with his left paw and raising his right paw to strike him.
At that instant the Atheist cried out, “Oh God!”
Time stopped. The bear froze. The forest was silent.
As a bright light shone upon the man, a voice came out of the sky.
“You deny my existence for all these years, teach others I don’t exist, and even credit creation to cosmic accident. Do you expect me to help you out of this predicament? Am I to count you as a believer?”
The atheist looked directly into the light and said, “It would be hypocritical of me to suddenly ask you to treat me as a Christian now, but perhaps you could make the bear a Christian?”
“Very well,” said the voice.
The light went out. The sounds of the forest resumed. And the bear dropped his right paw, brought both paws together, bowed his head and said:
“Lord bless this food, which I am about to receive from thy bounty. Amen.”
I can’t remember where I found this little story but it helps to illustrate another facet of the incoherence of atheism. We’ve all heard the tired line that, ‘if the Christian God was truly loving then there would be no evil in the world or we wouldn’t face difficulties in life,’ or something similar.
Most atheists see this as a “kill shot” in that their superior intelligence just did away with thousands of years of religious belief. The objection is easily dismissed and rejected.
One, God never promised our lives on earth would be easy and that they wouldn’t be without pain and hardship. In fact, they are to be expected. And two, why would anyone think that if they rejected God’s commands on how to live a peaceful and fulfilled life, that peace and fulfillment would come of their own accord? If you reject God, why would God feel some sort of obligation to you to ensure that your life was free from hardship? It’s an absurd claim to make, especially for an atheist who believes there is no purpose or direction to the natural order.
In his heart, the atheist does not want to believe in anyone above him. He has set himself as the god of his own life and only to himself will he have to answer. This objection to God’s existence is merely the outworking of his unbelief in order to soothe his conscience in that unbelief. It is not logical. It is not rational. Atheism by its very nature is incoherent and should never be taken seriously by anyone.






-On June 24th, 2022, Roe v. Wade, the 1973 US Supreme Court decision that magically invented a constitutional right to abortion, was overturned. It was bad law from the beginning (even Ruth Bader Ginsburg has admitted this) and most who understand how a constitutional republic operates, know this. Yet that didn’t stop abortion advocates from crying about having their “rights” taken from them, which did not occur.


I’ve always enjoyed road trips, especially those that have taken me through small town America. Many of these places seem suspended in time and cause one to wish for the simpler times of decades past. There is something melancholy about them, with outdated signs and buildings that have become ugly eyesores on the landscape from lack of upkeep. The world has left many of these places behind. For me, the saddest of all is seeing the collapsing remains of old wooden homes and barns. They were once a dream that signified a new beginning and exciting time for someone. I’m not sure when it started but at some point every time I passed one of these dilapidated structures I would say to myself, “there’s another dream that died.”






I recently watched the 8-part docu-drama series from 2021 called
Don’t Look Up is a new movie on Netflix whose purpose is to ramp up the climate change alarmism; the next catastrophic pivot point now that Covid-19 is waning. Climate Change is the religion of the secular left and Hollywood mouthpieces are its prophets, announcing the “end is near” and “repentance through taxation and lifestyle change” is necessary for “salvation from the coming doom.” It’s all quite cliche.



I was recently told in conversation that I hold some “extreme views.” It was clear the person I was talking to prided themselves on being “moderate,” and therefore, by default, in their mind, correct. I think to them it made them sound more reasonable and virtuous than someone like me. Now, in that conversation they were unable to rebut the particular points I made so they resorted to the age-old lowbrow tactic of announcing something about my person that they thought somehow invalidated my argument. They didn’t, and clearly couldn’t, make an argument against what I was saying; at least not in that moment. While the ad hominem fallacy has long been used in arguments, in our social media age it has become so common that profitable debate is nearly impossible.
-If the Covid vaccines were truly safe and effective, which they clearly are not with an honest look at the data, people would not be willing to give up their jobs and livelihoods to avoid the shot. Remember, the survival rate for those infected is still above 99.5% for all combined age groups and co-morbidity profiles. The average age of death from Covid is higher than life expectancy globally, and here in Canada the average age of Covid death is 86 (life expectancy is 82) and each person that died had an average of 2.6 co-morbidities present. This pandemic has had almost no impact on life expectancy. The Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918, on the other hand, caused a 28% drop in life expectancy in the US in just over a year. If these vaccines were really “safe and effective,” the government would not need a campaign to threaten, coerce, and blackmail people to take it. They are not concerned with public health as they would not be looking to fire 15%-20% of unvaccinated healthcare workers in the middle of a crisis when they are needed most. They only want your complete submission to their rule over you. This is all anyone really needs to know.


Today (August 27th), I had a conversation with my doctor who has been my doctor for 30 years. He called to give me the lab results of the blood test I had to determine if I had had a previous Covid-19 infection. The test was negative; I showed no antibodies of prior infection. I was hoping I did. He asked if I was going to get vaccinated and that “it was his duty” to recommend the vaccination. I told him, “no, I had no plans to.”

So a few days ago the Biden Administration